GenBI: the end of the data analyst bottleneck

What if anyone could “talk” to the database without knowing SQL? Welcome to the revolution you’ve been waiting for (and dreading).

---

If you’re a data analyst at a company, you know this scene: the marketing director shows up at 5:30 PM on Friday with “a quick question.” They need Q3 sales filtered by region, product, and customer type. For yesterday.

You know that “quick question” means three JOINs, a GROUP BY with HAVING, and probably discovering that regional data has been loaded incorrectly since October. Two hours minimum. And there goes your Friday.

GenBI promises to end this. The question is: is it real or just hype?

What GenBI is (and isn’t)

GenBI stands for Generative Business Intelligence. The idea is simple: instead of writing SQL queries or navigating pre-built dashboards, users ask questions in natural language and get answers.

“What were Q3 sales by region?” → The system generates the query, executes it, and returns the result. Maybe with a chart. Maybe with a text summary.

Sounds like ChatGPT connected to a database. And in its most basic form, that’s exactly what it is. The problem is that basic form is dangerous.

Why “ChatGPT + SQL” doesn’t work

If you connect an LLM directly to your database and tell it “generate SQL queries from questions,” you’re going to have problems. Many problems.

Semantic hallucinations. The model doesn’t understand your business. It doesn’t know that “sales” at your company means the fact_sales table excluding returns, that “region” comes from dim_geography, and that you need to filter by is_active = 1. It will invent joins that don’t exist or interpret fields incorrectly. I’ve documented the types of failures LLMs make and this is one of the most common.

Inconsistency. Ask the same thing two different ways, get two different answers. “Q3 sales” and “revenue in July-August-September” should give the same number. Without business context, they won’t.

Security. Do you really want an LLM generating arbitrary SQL against your production database? One badly generated DELETE and you’ve got a serious problem.

Performance. LLMs don’t optimize queries. They can generate queries that work but take 40 minutes to execute because they don’t use indexes or do unnecessary full table scans.

The semantic layer: the missing ingredient

The difference between “GenBI that works” and “ChatGPT connected to SQL” is the semantic layer.

A semantic layer is an abstraction that defines, in business terms, what your data means. It defines that “sales” is SUM(fact_sales.amount) WHERE is_returned = 0. It defines that “active customer” is one with last_purchase_date > DATEADD(month, -6, GETDATE()). It defines the relationships between tables and aggregation rules.

When the LLM receives a question, it doesn’t generate SQL directly. First it translates to semantic layer concepts, then the semantic layer generates the correct, optimized SQL.

The difference:

• “Generate SQL for sales by region” → Potentially incorrect SQL
• “The user wants the ‘sales’ metric grouped by the ‘region’ dimension” → Guaranteed correct SQL

Tools like Cube, dbt Semantic Layer, or AtScale implement this. It’s not new, but the combination with LLMs makes it accessible in a way that wasn’t possible before.

If you work with Power BI, this sounds familiar: the tabular model with DAX is essentially a semantic layer. Measures define business metrics, relationships define how tables connect. GenBI applies the same concept but with a natural language interface.

What this means for you (data analyst)

Here’s the uncomfortable part. If your job mainly consists of translating business questions to SQL and returning Excel tables, GenBI is an existential threat.

Not tomorrow. Not next month. But in 2-3 years, most ad-hoc queries will be done by users themselves talking to the system.

The good news: someone has to build and maintain that semantic layer. Someone has to define business metrics, validate that data is correct, and ensure the system doesn’t return garbage.

That someone is you. But the job changes.

From: “Receive requests → Write SQL → Return Excel” To: “Design semantic model → Validate data quality → Govern access”

It’s more strategic work, closer to the business, and frankly more interesting. But it requires different skills. If you’re thinking about making the leap, I wrote about the transition from analyst to data engineer.

How to prepare

Learn about semantic layers. dbt Semantic Layer, Cube, Looker’s LookML. Understand how metrics and dimensions are modeled declaratively.

Improve your business knowledge. The semantic layer is only as good as the definitions it contains. If you don’t understand what “churned customer” means for your company, you can’t model it.

Get familiar with data governance. Who can ask what, which data is sensitive, how queries are audited. GenBI without governance is a disaster waiting to happen.

Experiment with the tools. Build a prototype with your data. Connect an LLM to a basic semantic layer. Understand the limitations before your boss asks you to implement it in production.

The elephant in the room

GenBI won’t work for everything. Complex questions requiring implicit context, open-ended explorations where even the user doesn’t know what they’re looking for, analyses requiring human creativity… that’s still your territory.

And let’s be honest: most companies don’t have their data clean and documented enough for GenBI to work well. Before talking to data in natural language, you need the data to make sense. And that’s a problem we’ve been failing to solve for decades.

But for repetitive queries, Friday’s “quick questions,” monthly reports that are always the same… yes, a machine will do that.

The question isn’t whether it will happen. It’s whether you’ll be the one implementing it or the one replaced by it.

---

Is your company exploring GenBI? Have you tried connecting LLMs to your data? Share your experience.